Test Reviews of Pro Audio Gear and Mixing Consoles

Understatement
Analog Stereo Mastering Processing Gear
adt-audio ToolMod MS and BM

Translation of a test review from German Studio-Magazin by
Dieter Kahlen

PREVIOUS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | NEXT

We reckon that the low ripple of the eq’s overall frequency response, shown in Diagram 2 is caused by small tolerances of the center detents of the gain controls. However, these tolerances cause no error in the channel tracking accuracy that is better than 0.2 dB. The Diagram no. 3 shows these differences with a zoomed dB scale. Who is looking for a higher precision, will not get around buying a mastering equalizer with stepper switches at a considerably higher price, which is presumably more expensive than the entire adt-audio mastering set including the extensive dynamics section.

The phase accuracy between the stereo channels, which is of elementary importance, remains exemplary flat in spite of the minor changes of the frequency response.

The common mode rejection ratio of all line inputs was in the range of –80 dBr, depending on the particular module and the test frequency; the cross talk between the stereo channels, shown in Diagram no. 6, remained below –70 dBr up to a frequency of 15 kHz.

Diagram 1 - Frequency and Phase Response,
Mic Pre TM101
Mic Pre Frequency and Phase Response

Diagram 2 - Frequency and Phase Response
ToolMod BM
Frequency and Phase Response ToolMod BM
Diagram 3 - Channel Balance vs Frequency
very high resolution, ToolMod BM
Channel Balance vs Frequency

Diagram 4 - FFT Noise Spec ToolMod BM FFT Noise Spec
Diagram 5 - Stereo Limiter TM215
Characteristics
Stereo Limiter Characteristics
Diagram 6 - Stereo Crosstalk
ToolMod BM
Crosstalk

PREVIOUS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | NEXT

PRO AUDIO :
AUDIO MODULES :
SURROUND SOUND
ANALOG AUDIO
CONSOLES :
BROADCAST
MIXING CONSOLES:
LIVE CONSOLE:

Where to buy
Download
Reference List
Audio Studios
Links
Link to us
Imprint